About ProjectTruth/Aaron Thomas

Contact ProjectTruth/AaronThomas

Updates

Main Page (Letter to Community)



ProjectTruth Statement of Purpose

Letter to Community (Main Page)

CPA Verification

Falsity of Excommunication Order

C.R.C. Permission for Civil Suit

Evidence from the C.R.C.

CoverUp of Fraudulent Excommunication

My Cooperation with Rabbi Fuerst

Innocent until Proven Guilty

Rabbi Fuerst's Response to the Letter to the Community

Thomas v. Rabbi Fuerst, No. 01-L-013595

Sworn Affidavit of Aaron Thomas

Excommunication Order

The Source for This Procedure

About Aaron Thomas

Contact AaronThomas/ProjectTruth


























































My Cooperation with Rabbi Fuerst

On approximately Feb. 15,2000, during a three-week visit to Memphis, I received a phone call from Rabbi Feurst informing me that Danny Shabat wanted Rabbi Feurst to summons me to a Din Torah regarding my irreligious filing of a civil law-suit in Chicago. Rabbi Feurst asked me to explain my justification for resorting to the secular courts, and asked if I was willing to come before his Beit Din to respond to Shabat's complaint.

To the latter question I responded affirmatively. To the former question, I explained to Rabbi Feurst that from Sept. 1998 thru January 2000, I had religiously invested exhaustive efforts to meet the Shabats in Beit Din, to no avail; and that I was exercising my right to seek adjudication in civil court per the permission of the C.R.C. Beit Din. I then faxed to Rabbi Feurst all the written communication between Thomas & C.R.C. Beit Din & Shabat evidencing this.

On the eve of my departure home to Israel, on Feb. 28, 2000, I received a first summons to choose a date to appear before Rabbi Feurst, to defend my filing a civil suit. I returned to Israel on March 1, 2000.

On March 21, 2000, I responded in writing to Rabi Feurst that I would come at any time to defend myself in his Beit Din, but that in view of my recent lengthy stay in the U.S. that was not utilized for a hearing, I felt that Shabat should pay my expenses to attend, if a hearing was desired before my next scheduled trip to Chicago in July. I received no response.

Two months later, on May 23, 2000, I received another summons from Rabbi Feurst entitled, "Second Summons" that read "Danny Shabat is still summoning you to a Din Torah. Please contact me..." Attached thereto was the Shabats' rabbinical representative's objection to my request for expenses. I telephoned my response to Rabbi Feurst, that I would be in Chicago in July for a hearing in Circuit Court, and that directly thereafter I would be available to appear before his Beit din. I did not receive any response.

During my July 2000 trip to Chicago, I again heard from Rabbi Feurst. On Wed., July 19, at 10:00 P.M., I arrived home and there was a fax waiting for me from Rabbi Feurst. It was entitled "Third and Final Summons" and in it, Rabbi Feurst threatened to excommunicate me if I don't come before his beit din. I called him immediately to protest his reference to a "third summons", and after an initial few sentences he hung up abruptly saying he didn't have time for me that night and that I should call him "tomorrow".

Thurs., July 20, afternoon.

I called back Rabbi Feurst and asked when I could come over to respond to his summons. He answered that I couldn't come over, but rather I would have to speak with him over the phone. I explained that I did not wish to speak about such matters over the phone, and that I felt I had a right to a face to face hearing. He adamantly refused. I asked him if he had spoken to Danny in a face to face setting. Rabbi Feurst hesitantly answered that he had spoken to Danny face to face, and that Danny had told him "what happened".

I insisted that in that case I had a right to a face to face communication, and I asked if it was proper for a purported Dayan to listen to one side, ex parte. He was annoyed by my inquisitiveness and quite indignantly stated that he was not required to provide me with a "din vecheshbon" (an accounting).

I was in the middle of a sentence that in a neutral tone began, "It seems to me Rabbi Feurst that you are quite interested in protecting Danny and Margie from public disgrace; ..." (my intention was to politely tell him that publicity was going to happen soon in any case) and Rabbi Feurst cut me short saying, "I don't have to listen to your baloney", and he hung up the phone in my face.

Oct. 30, 2000 - 11:30 P.M.

Phone rings in Israel. It's Rabbi Feurst on the line.

He asks me if I'm planning to take my claim out of civil court. I say to him that I don't foresee that happening, because I'm well within my rights. He says that I'm leaving him no choice but to excommunicate me. I tell him that I will be very upset if he does that.

He hangs up without a good-bye.

Monday, Dec. 4, 2000

Howard Hoffmann (Shabat's attorney) calls me in the morning to continue his attempts to explore settlement possibilities. My intransigence becomes clear to him, and we disengage about 12:00. Within an hour, there is an envelope delivered to both me and my host declaring my being excommunicated by Rabbi Feurst. It's dated and signed October 31, 2000.

TOP OF THIS PAGE